Select the IPv6 source address and corresponding router (if any) using
a very simplified version of the algorithm from RFC6724:
- Ignore any source address that has a smaller scope than the
destination address. For example, do not use a link-local source
address when sending to a global destination address.
- If we have a source address which is on the same link as the
destination address, then use that source address.
- If we are left with multiple possible source addresses, then choose
the address with the smallest scope. For example, if we are sending
to a site-local destination address and we have both a global source
address and a site-local source address, then use the site-local
source address.
- If we are still left with multiple possible source addresses, then
choose the address with the longest matching prefix.
For the purposes of this algorithm, we treat RFC4193 Unique Local
Addresses as having organisation-local scope. Since we use only
link-local scope for our multicast transmissions, this approximation
should remain valid in all practical situations.
Originally-implemented-by: Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Use the IPv6 settings to construct the routing table, in a matter
analogous to the construction of the IPv4 routing table.
This allows for manual assignment of IPv6 addresses via e.g.
set net0/ip6 2001:ba8:0:1d4::6950:5845
set net0/len6 64
set net0/gateway6 fe80::226:bff:fedd:d3c0
The prefix length ("len6") may be omitted, in which case a default
prefix length of 64 will be assumed.
Multiple IPv6 addresses may be assigned manually by implicitly
creating child settings blocks. For example:
set net0/ip6 2001:ba8:0:1d4::6950:5845
set net0.ula/ip6 fda4:2496:e992::6950:5845
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
A reasonable user expectation is that ${net0/ip6} should show the
"highest-priority" of the IPv6 addresses, even when multiple IPv6
addresses are active. The expected order of priority is likely to be
manually-assigned addresses first, then stateful DHCPv6 addresses,
then SLAAC addresses, and lastly link-local addresses.
Using ${priority} to enforce an ordering is undesirable since that
would affect the priority assigned to each of the net<N> blocks as a
whole, so use the sibling ordering capability instead.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Originally-implemented-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Originally-implemented-by: Marin Hannache <git@mareo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Expose the IPv6 address (or prefix) as ${ip6}, the prefix length as
${len6}, and the router address as ${gateway6}.
Originally-implemented-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Originally-implemented-by: Marin Hannache <git@mareo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
TCP/IP checksum fields are one's complement values and therefore have
two possible representations of zero: positive zero (0x0000) and
negative zero (0xffff).
In RFC768, UDP over IPv4 exploits this redundancy to repurpose the
positive representation of zero (0x0000) to mean "no checksum
calculated"; checksums are optional for UDP over IPv4.
In RFC2460, checksums are made mandatory for UDP over IPv4. The
wording of the RFC is such that the UDP header is mandated to use only
the negative representation of zero (0xffff), rather than simply
requiring the checksum to be correct but allowing for either
representation of zero to be used.
In RFC1071, an example algorithm is given for calculating the TCP/IP
checksum. This algorithm happens to produce only the positive
representation of zero (0x0000); this is an artifact of the way that
unsigned arithmetic is used to calculate a signed one's complement
sum (and its final negation).
A common misconception has developed (exemplified in RFC1624) that
this artifact is part of the specification. Many people have assumed
that the checksum field should never contain the negative
representation of zero (0xffff).
A sensible receiver will calculate the checksum over the whole packet
and verify that the result is zero (in whichever representation of
zero happens to be generated by the receiver's algorithm). Such a
receiver will not care which representation of zero happens to be used
in the checksum field.
However, there are receivers in existence which will verify the
received checksum the hard way: by calculating the checksum over the
remainder of the packet and comparing the result against the checksum
field. If the representation of zero used by the receiver's algorithm
does not match the representation of zero used by the transmitter (and
so placed in the checksum field), and if the receiver does not
explicitly allow for both representations to compare as equal, then
the receiver may reject packets with a valid checksum.
For UDP, the combined RFCs effectively mandate that we should generate
only the negative representation of zero in the checksum field.
For IP, TCP and ICMP, the RFCs do not mandate which representation of
zero should be used, but the misconceptions which have grown up around
RFC1071 and RFC1624 suggest that it would be least surprising to
generate only the positive representation of zero in the checksum
field.
Fix by ensuring that all of our checksum algorithms generate only the
positive representation of zero, and explicitly inverting this in the
case of transmitted UDP packets.
Reported-by: Wissam Shoukair <wissams@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Wissam Shoukair <wissams@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
When an IPv6 socket address string specifies a link-local or multicast
address but does not specify the requisite network device name
(e.g. "fe80::69ff:fe50:5845" rather than "fe80::69ff:fe50:5845%net0"),
assume the use of "netX".
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
At some point in the past few years, binutils became more aggressive
at removing unused symbols. To function as a symbol requirement, a
relocation record must now be in a section marked with @progbits and
must not be in a section which gets discarded during the link (either
via --gc-sections or via /DISCARD/).
Update REQUIRE_SYMBOL() to generate relocation records meeting these
criteria. To minimise the impact upon the final binary size, we use
existing symbols (specified via the REQUIRING_SYMBOL() macro) as the
relocation targets where possible. We use R_386_NONE or R_X86_64_NONE
relocation types to prevent any actual unwanted relocation taking
place. Where no suitable symbol exists for REQUIRING_SYMBOL() (such
as in config.c), the macro PROVIDE_REQUIRING_SYMBOL() can be used to
generate a one-byte-long symbol to act as the relocation target.
If there are versions of binutils for which this approach fails, then
the fallback will probably involve killing off REQUEST_SYMBOL(),
redefining REQUIRE_SYMBOL() to use the current definition of
REQUEST_SYMBOL(), and postprocessing the linked ELF file with
something along the lines of "nm -u | wc -l" to check that there are
no undefined symbols remaining.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
If ipv6_tx() is called with a non-NULL network device, a NULL or
unspecified source address, and a destination address which does not
match any routing table entry, then it will attempt to copy the source
address from a NULL pointer.
I don't think that there is currently any code path which could
trigger this behaviour, but we should probably ensure that it can
never happen.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Destination multicast addresses require a sin6_scope_id, which should
therefore be transcribed to a network device name by ipv6_sock_ntoa().
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Provide the function tcpip_mtu() to allow external code to determine
the (transport-layer) maximum transmission unit for a given socket
address.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Provide the function tcpip_netdev() to allow external code to
determine the transmitting network device for a given socket address.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Allow for the existence of references to IPv6 setting types without
dragging in the whole IPv6 stack, by placing the definition of
setting_type_ipv6 in core/settings.c and providing weak stub methods
for parse_ipv6_setting() and format_ipv6_setting().
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
The fetch_setting() family of functions may currently modify the
definition of the specified setting (e.g. to add missing type
information). Clean up this interface by requiring callers to provide
an explicit buffer to contain the completed definition of the fetched
setting, if required.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Allow for IPv6 routing table entries to be created for an on-link
prefix where a local address has not yet been assigned to the network
device.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Most network upper-layer drivers do not implement all three methods
(probe, notify, and remove). Save code by making all methods
optional.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
When transmitting to a link-local or multicast destination address,
use the network device's link-local address as the source address if
no explicit source address has been specified.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
The IPv6 option length field represents the length of the option data
field, not the overall length of the option.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Replace the existing partially-implemented IPv6 stack with a fresh
implementation.
This implementation is not yet complete. The IPv6 transmit and
receive datapaths are functional (including fragment reassembly and
parsing of arbitrary extension headers). NDP neighbour solicitations
and advertisements are supported. ICMPv6 echo is supported.
At present, only link-local addresses may be used, and there is no way
to specify an IPv6 address as part of a URI (either directly or via
a DNS lookup).
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Allow the link layer to directly report whether or not a packet is
multicast or broadcast at the time of calling pull(), rather than
relying on heuristics to determine this at a later stage.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
FCoE requires the use of fabric-provided MAC addresses, which breaks
the assumption that the net device's MAC address is implicitly the
source address for net_tx() and the (unicast) destination address for
net_rx().
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Declarations without the accompanying __table_entry cause misalignment
of the table entries when using gcc 4.5. Fix by adding the
appropriate __table_entry macro or (where possible) by removing
unnecessary forward declarations.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Jaroszyński <p.jaroszynski@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Access to the gpxe.org and etherboot.org domains and associated
resources has been revoked by the registrant of the domain. Work
around this problem by renaming project from gPXE to iPXE, and
updating URLs to match.
Also update README, LOG and COPYRIGHTS to remove obsolete information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
When sending to a multicast address, it may be necessary to specify
the source address explicitly, since the multicast destination address
does not provide enough information to deduce the source address via
the miniroute table.
Allow the source address specified via the data-xfer metadata to be
passed down through the TCP/IP stack to the IPv4 layer, which can use
it as a default source address.
Michael Brown